Detection of aerosolized bacterial spores using honey
bees as collectors.
Introduction:
Background
-
Honey bees carry an electrostatic charge as they fly. This charge
is involved in pollen collection and is an important factor in particle
adsorption (Fig. 1).
-
Bees typically fly up to 4 km from the hive to find food sources, and are
known to fly up to 13.7 km from the hive to find food.
-
There are an estimated 2.9 million beehives in the US (excluding beekeepers
with fewer than 5 hives).
-
Beehives are very low maintenance and can be kept almost anywhere.
Figure 1: Effects of electrostatic charge and season on bacterial
spore adsorption onto tethered honey bees in a wind tunnel.
Proposed applications
-
Bacteria, and probably fungi and viruses, can all be assayed with this
technology
-
Surveillance for biowarfare/ bioterrorism agents
-
Surveillance for anti-crop agents
-
Surveillance for non-BW crop pathogens (i.e. general agricultural use)
-
Survey endemic micro-organisms (background)
-
Survey potential environmental indicator micro-organisms
Current capabilities:
Methods
-
Laboratory tests in custom wind tunnel (Fig. 2) with controlled temperature,
wind speed, and humidity.
-
Aerosol generation (test scenario) - Stained or unstained spores are suspended
in water and aerosolized using clean compressed air.
-
Bee collection - Bees are collected individually with sterilized forceps
and placed into sterile screw-cap test tubes.
-
Culture - Bees are sonicated in sterile water and the rinse solution is
heated to 70°C to kill vegetative bacteria, then filtered. The
spore-retaining filter is rolled onto an agar culture plate and/or dried
and viewed under a microscope.
-
PCR - Bees are rinsed in sterile water. Spore coat disrupted with
detergent, DNA precipitated, and PCR performed with spore-specific primers:
-
BG36f-TTCAGACTACACTTTCGGGG
-
BG266r-GGAAACCCCCTAACACTTAGC
Figure 2. Custom wind tunnel for testing aerosol adsorption onto
tethered flying honey bees. Bees are suspended in the induction tube,
which measures the electrostatic charge on the bee.
Detection of aerosolized spores
-
Bees adsorbed spores from an aerosol cloud (Fig. 3) generated in the SwRI
TENT facility
-
A mathematical model has been developed for spore adsorption onto bees
(Fig. 4)
PDF,
258Kb
Figure 3. Spores collected from bees flying through an aerosol cloud
on two separate days.

Figure 4. Graphical representation of model formula for particle
adsorption/ desorption.
Detection of surface deposited spores
-
Bees adsorb spores from flower surfaces (Table 1). A patch of 30-50
flowers on an aster plant were dusted with <1 mg spores. Bees
were collected after contacting 1-3 inoculated flowers for 5-30 seconds
and then landing on a non-inoculated flower. Control bees were collected
from nearby non-inoculated flowers.
Table 1. Bacterial spores collected from bees after 5-20 seconds
contact with flowers dusted with spores. Control bees collected from
flowers adjacent to inoculated flowers.
| Experiment: |
Bee: |
Spores on bee: |
| Flowers dusted with spores |
Control |
0 |
| 20 min before bee collection |
Control |
0 |
|
Control |
1 |
|
Control |
0 |
|
1 |
>30,000 |
|
2 |
>30,000 |
|
3 |
1,500 |
|
4 |
7,500 |
|
5 |
10,000 |
|
6 |
10,000 |
| Flowers dusted with spores |
Control |
0 |
| 2 days before bee collection |
Control |
1 |
|
Control |
0 |
|
7 |
>30,000 |
|
8 |
>30,000 |
|
9 |
>30,000 |
|
10 |
1,500 |
|
11 |
>30,000 |
|
12 |
6,000 |
| Flowers dusted with spores |
Control |
0 |
| 20 min before bee collection |
Control |
0 |
|
Control |
0 |
|
13 |
7,500 |
|
14 |
>30,000 |
|
15 |
15,000 |
|
16 |
>30,000 |
|
17 |
>30,000 |
|
18 |
>30,000 |
Future development:
Develop molecular methods to survey biological organisms in hive
material
-
Assay wax, honey, pollen, and propolis fractions for microbial DNA
-
Assay for pathogens in endemic areas using local hives
Develop a hive- or feeder mounted collection system
-
Automatic bee collection - maximum spore retention but bees sacrificed
-
Develop system to collect/concentrate adsorbed materials while excluding
bees - bees unharmed but reduced material recovery
Investigate mechanisms of adsorption to increase adsorption efficiency
References:
Electrostatic charge:
-
Measurement of electric charges carried by bees: Evidence of biological
variations. Colin, ME, D Richard, and S Chauzy (1991). J. Bioelec.
10: 17-32.
-
Are electrostatic forces involved in pollen transfer? Corbet, SA,
J Beament, and D Eisikowitch (1982). Plant, Cell, and Environ. 5:
125-129.
-
Surface electric potentials on worker honeybees leaving and entering the
hive. Erickson, EH (1975). J. Apic. Res. 14: 141-147.
-
Bees scavenge airborne bacteria. Lighthart, B, KR Prier, GM Loper,
and JJ Bromenshenk (2000). Microb. Ecol. 39: 314-321.
PDF,
180Kb
-
An adsorption model of aerosolized bacterial spores (Bacillus subtilis
var. niger) onto free-flying honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and its validation.
Prier, KR, B Lighthart, and JJ Bromenshenk (2001). Environ. Entomol.
30:1188-1194.
PDF,
258Kb
-
Mechanisms of generation and perception of electric fields by honey bees.
Yes'kov, YK, and AM Sapozhnikov (1976). Biofizika 21: 1124-1130.
Bee flight range:
-
The flight range of the honeybee. Eckert, JE (1933). J. Agric.
Res. 47: 257-285.
-
Foraging range and distribution of honey bees used for carrot and onion
pollination. Gary, NE, PC Witherell, and J Marston (1972). Environ.
Entomol. 1: 71-78.
Hive numbers:
-
The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000. Morse,
RA, and NW Calderone (2000). Bee
Culture 128: Insert, 15 p.
This web site is maintained by Kevin
Prier, MARL. Created 3 May, 2001. Last updated Friday,
8 February, 2002.